Storm damage claims.

Roof, chimney, gable, boundary and outbuilding damage after a storm are common. So is the insurer arguing that the loss is really wear and tear. We argue the cause with evidence.

Overview

What this claim really involves.

A storm claim looks obvious to the policyholder standing next to a fallen tree or a stripped roof. To the insurer, the same damage sometimes reads as pre-existing wear and tear that a storm merely finished off. The evidence, weather data on the day, condition surveys and specialist reports, is what turns a disputed claim into a paid one.

Common issues

Where storm damage claims go wrong.

The things we most often see mis-handled when a policyholder tries to run this type of claim on their own.

Free review

No cost. No obligation. We will tell you within one conversation whether this is a claim worth pursuing.

Start a free review

Common issues we see

  • Roof damage rejected as wear and tear without proper condition survey
  • Chimney and gable losses under-scoped on rebuild versus repair
  • Boundary walls and fences excluded, then included, depending on the specific policy
  • Outbuildings and garages missed in the initial scope
  • Consequential water ingress claim run separately from the storm claim and settled short

What KBR Management does

  • Gather Met Office data for the incident date to evidence storm conditions
  • Instruct a roofing surveyor where condition is disputed
  • Prepare a full scope covering primary damage and consequential water ingress in one claim
  • Argue policy wording where the insurer applies a narrow interpretation

How to appoint us

Call an assessor on 0800 980 2230, or send a note through the free review form. Please include the property postcode and, if you have it, the name of your insurer and the policy number. We will read your policy, look at the loss, and tell you honestly where you stand.

There is no obligation to appoint us after the free review.

Common questions

About storm damage claims

Answers to the questions we hear most often about this claim type.

Most policies rely on Met Office wind speed and rainfall thresholds. We check the reading at the nearest station on the incident date as part of the evidence.
Yes. Wear and tear is generally excluded from buildings cover. The argument is usually not whether it is excluded, but whether the damage in front of us was caused by the storm event or by pre-existing wear.
Cover varies by policy. Some include a limited amount for boundary damage from storm, some exclude it. We check your specific wording.

Got a storm damage claim right now?